Anthony Bradshaw
Case study

Services Division Restructure, $15M Construction Firm

General Manager  |  Virginia  |  April 2023 to March 2025
+24%
Annual revenue, during an active financial turnaround
+11%
Profit margin expansion over the same period
98%
On-time delivery across 50+ projects running $500K to $2.5M

Context

This was a high-end residential and commercial construction firm in Virginia, carrying a $15M portfolio of complex renovations and custom builds. The Services Division inside it ran three departments, home maintenance and handyman work, small projects covering bath and kitchen remodels and landscaping, and large projects handling full renovations and additions. I came in as General Manager during an active financial turnaround, which is worth saying up front, because the money to fix things the easy way was not there.

The Situation

The division was underperforming and the reasons were structural. Margins had compressed, field execution was inconsistent from crew to crew and job to job, and there was no standardized leadership structure holding any of it together. The division leader was carrying roughly 40 direct reports, which is not a span of control, it is a queue, and it meant every decision routed through one person who was already underwater. Project planning had no standard sequence behind it, so jobs were started against whoever was available rather than against what the schedule actually needed. Billing workflows were slow enough that cash was arriving well after the work was finished. The people were good and the work was good, and neither one was being helped by the way the division was put together.

What I Did

Rebuilt the hierarchy first, because nothing else was going to hold without it. I took the division leader from roughly 40 direct reports down to 4, with 36 indirect underneath them, and gave each of the three departments a named owner with the authority to run it. Every position got a written role definition and an accountability measure attached to it, so people knew what they owned instead of guessing at it. That single change did more for the division than anything else on this page, and it cost nothing but the work of sitting down and drawing it.

Standardized how projects get planned and executed. I put a project management system in behind the division and built standard sequences for planning, execution and monitoring, with real timelines, checklists and progress reviews on a schedule. Once the sequence was the same on every job, the division could run more projects at once without the throughput falling over, and we held 98% on-time delivery across 50 plus projects with budgets between $500,000 and $2.5 million.

Restructured the financial controls from the ground up. I rebuilt the billing workflows and the cash management between finance and sales, which took days sales outstanding down 15%, and I tightened the operational controls sitting underneath the margin so the division stopped giving away profit in places nobody was watching. Revenue finished up 24% and margins expanded 11% over the same window, and that happened while the parent business was still working through its own turnaround.

Built the bench instead of replacing it. I mentored a leadership team of 18 project managers and put a development program behind them, and we came out of the turnaround with zero attrition among key leadership. That is the number I am proudest of on this project, because turnarounds usually cost you your best people, and this one did not.

Results

Financial
Result
Annual revenue+24%
Profit margin+11%
Days sales outstanding−15%
Operational efficiency+28%
Operating and People
BeforeAfter
Direct reports on the division leader404
Indirect reports underneath036
On-time delivery, 50+ projectsinconsistent98%
Attrition among 18 senior PMsthrough turnaroundzero

What It Proved

The division did not have a people problem, and it did not have a demand problem either. It had a structure problem, and once the structure was fixed the same crews and the same project managers produced a 24% revenue increase and 11% more margin without anybody working longer hours to get there. The efficiency gain of 28% came out of workflow and technology, which means it was sitting on the table the whole time and nobody had been given the room to go pick it up. I would rather have that outcome than one built on adding headcount, because the structure holds after I leave and the headcount does not.

The Transferable Part

When one person is carrying forty direct reports, every problem in that division is downstream of that one fact, and fixing anything else first is wasted motion. Build the hierarchy, put a name on every seat, and give the people who are already there the room to run their piece of it. In this case that produced the revenue, the margin and the delivery rate inside the same headcount the division already had, and it did it during a turnaround when there was no money to buy the answer.

More Case Studies
Contact

The fastest way to reach me is email, and I answer within one business day.

[email protected]